OCCLUSION: COLD CONVEYOR BELT TYPE - KEY PARAMETERS

by ZAMG


In this case (28 March 1997) the jet axis from the numerical model differs from the features in the satellite images, and a northward shift of some degrees seems to be necessary. The case of 19 October 1996 does not have this deviation problem and supports the dominance of shear vorticity.
28 March 1997/12.00 UTC - Meteosat IR image; magenta: height contours 1000 hPa, cyan: height contours 500 hPa
28 March 1997/12.00 UTC - Meteosat IR image; blue: thermal front parameter 500/850 hPa, green: equivalent thickness 500/850 hPa
28 March 1997/12.00 UTC - Meteosat IR image; blue: thermal front parameter 500/850 hPa, red: warm advection 500/1000 hPa
28 March 1997/12.00 UTC - Meteosat IR image; green: positive vorticity advection (PVA) 500 hPa
28 March 1997/12.00 UTC - Meteosat IR image; yellow: isotachs 300 hPa, black: zero line of shear vorticity 300 hPa, red: positive vorticity advection (PVA) 300 hPa
28 March 1997/12.00 UTC - Meteosat IR image; blue: shear vorticity 300 hPa, brown: curvature vorticity 300 hPa
19 October 1996/06.00 UTC - Meteosat IR image: yellow: isotachs 300 hPa, black: zero line of shear vorticity 300 hPa, red: positive vorticity advection (PVA) 300 hPa
19 October 1996/06.00 UTC - Meteosat IR image; blue: shear vorticity 300 hPa, brown: curvature vorticity 300 hPa
For sub-types which might occur in a well-developed stage of this Occlusion type see Occlusion: Warm Conveyor Belt Type - Key Parameters .

SUB-MENU OF OCCLUSION: COLD CONVEYOR BELT TYPE
METEOROLOGICAL PHYSICAL BACKGROUND
TYPICAL APPEARANCE IN VERTICAL CROSS SECTIONS