by ZAMG
One main consequence might be drawn from such a configuration:
As there is only one conveyor belt involved, the temperature and humidity contrasts are rather low in the area of the frontal cloud band.
|
22 April 1999/06.00 UTC - Meteosat IR image; position of vertical cross section indicated
|
22 April 1999/06.00 UTC - Vertical cross section; black: isentropes (ThetaE), orange thin: IR pixel values, orange thick: WV
pixel values
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 April 1999/06.00 UTC - IR image; magenta: relative streams 306K, yellow: isobars 306K
|
22 April 1999/06.00 UTC - IR image; magenta: relative streams 314K, yellow: isobars 314K
|
Below the Warm Conveyor Belt, at 306K, the frontal cloud band is under the influence of the upper relative stream from behind, and which is descending from 400 hPa to 700 hPa.
If a Cold Front lies in warm advection the probability of intensification is quite small. There are several cases of weakening and several cases remaining unchanged.
Results of the investigation of CF in WA at ZAMG (30 cases):
| intensifying fronts | 13% |
| fronts remaining the same | 40% |
| weakening fronts | 47% |