This is a cloud configuration showing some of the typical Warm Front conditions: WA maxima, crowded thickness isolines and a TFP or a surface front line at the rear edge of the cloud field (see Key parameters). However it deviates from the classical Warm Front types (see Warm Front Band and Warm Front Shield ) in one important point: it is completely detached from the original frontal system (Cold Front and Warm Front) and can no longer be explained by the frontal processes in connection with the circulation in a low. Although not yet thoroughly investigated, there are some indications that conveyor belt theory can explain the maintenance of the Detached Warm Front.

In the case of an eastward moving classical frontal system the Detached Warm Front can mostly be observed within the eastern branch of a pronounced synoptic scale ridge in the height and thickness fields, being accompanied by strong winds in higher regions of the troposphere (approximately at 500 hPa) which blow normal to the movement of the ridge system.

A possible and often observed indication for the formation of a Detached Warm Front is a splitting of the wind field within the mid- and upper levels of the troposphere in the area of the Warm Front into a north-western and a strong southern stream. This causes the cloud field of the Detached Warm Front to move more or less fast southward within the eastern branch of the upper level ridge, which is in this case very close to the crowding zone of the equivalent thickness. The original frontal system, which is situated in the north, moves further on from west to east. Consequently the different air streams cause two WA maxima. WA maxima contribute to upward motion which is one reason for the maintenance of cloudiness.

A different view of the development and maintenance of a Detached Warm Front cloudiness is given by the conveyor belt model. Also for the Detached Warm Front a rising warm conveyor belt, as already described in detail in the Warm Front chapters, is the dominant feature. It is the same relative stream which is involved in the band- and shield-formed Warm Front. The cloudiness of the Detached Warm Front appears where the relative streams turn from the northern culmination point to south, south-western directions. But there are two main differences between the classical and the detached types. While in the band and shield type the Warm Conveyor Belt is sinking in the area just described, it is rising in the area of the Detached Warm Front. The reason for this may be the strongly inclined frontal zone, indicated in the crowding zone of the thickness as well as in the isentropes of a vertical cross section (see Typical appearance in vertical cross section). In the classical types either no frontal zone (band type) or a weakening (shield type) appears in the area under consideration. The second difference can be found in the location and orientation of the Warm Conveyor Belt which seems to be more in the south of the synoptic scale ridge, which leads to the fact that the rising Warm Conveyor Belt overruns the frontal line in the area of the Detached Warm Front. More investigations will be necessary.

Due to the orography in central Europe, the cloud field of the Detached Warm Front is moving against the northern or the windward side of the Alps and therefore Stau effects are superimposed (see Stau Cloudiness ) causing increased weather events there (see Weather events).

The two isentropic surfaces used for the relative streams in the figures below are 298K, which is within the main crowding zone, and 310K which is relevant for upper levels. On the lower isentropic surface there is a well developed warm conveyor belt from Spain across the British Isles to south Scandinavia where it turns to southern directions. Above central Europe the relative streams cross the TFP of the Detached Warm Front (see Key parameters) rising from about 650 hPa (north Poland and the Baltic Sea) up to 500 hPa (Slovenia and Croatia).

On the higher isentropic surface the Warm Conveyor Belt is rather similar. However, the rising in the area of the Detached Warm Front is rather less, from about 450 hPa over the Baltic Sea up to about 350 hPa over Slovenia and Croatia. The orientation of the relative stream lines fits much better with the orientation of the high cloud shield than on the lower isentropic surface.

This example does not show a separate relative stream for the remainder of the classical Warm Front over the Nordic Countries as described for the ideal case above. The reason for this can be found in different system velocities between the two Warm Fronts.