by KNMI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 December 2002/18.00 UTC - Meteosat WV image
|
18 December 2002/18.00 UTC - Meteosat WV image; red: potential vorticity 318K
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 December 2002/00.00 UTC - Meteosat WV image
|
19 December 2002/00.00 UTC - Meteosat WV image; red: potential vorticity 318K
|
WV Vortices often exist in front of frontal zones; consequently there are no distinct or intensive cloud structures. The reason that no other distinct cloud structures exist, is due to the fact that WV Vortices mainly develop in the upper levels of the troposphere. There is less cloud development in the lower levels because the lower parts of the troposphere often show a stable stratification, or insufficient moisture. This is one of the main differences with the conceptual model Upper Level Low. (See Upper Level Low and look at the table below). In the case of an Upper Level Low, the lower troposphere shows an unstable stratification and, as a consequence, clouds develop as convection occurs.
As already mentioned, a smaller scale trough is often superimposed on a large scale trough resulting in a small scale vortex. Smaller troughs are mobile and therefore WV Vortices move with the general flow. The reason for the movement of small troughs can be explained relatively simply.
From the geopotential tendency equation it can be seen that advection of vorticity can lead to the change of the geopotential height pattern. This vorticity advection term consistst of two parts: Advection of relative vorticity, and advection of earth's vorticity.
The relative vorticity can be writen as:
where ζg is the relative (geostrophic) vorticity, f0Coriolis parameter, ∇2 Laplacian operator, φ geopotential height.
From this equation it can be seen that the relative vorticity is proportional to the Laplacian of the geopotential height field. If we suppose that the geopotential height field is a sinusoid it can be shown that:
where L is the wavelength of the sinusoid.
The relative vorticity is inverse proportional to the square of the wavelength of the sinusoid. Note that the relative vorticity is inversely proportional to the square of the wavelength of the sinusoide. The shorter the sinusoidal wave, the stronger the vorticity will be. It can also be shown that the Earth's vorticity is inverse proportional to the wavelength of the sinusoid, therefore, relative vorticity will dominate the behaviour of short Waves and the earth's vorticity will dominate the long Waves. As a consequence, a WV Vortex, which is related to a short Wave, tends to move quickly. However, an Upper Level Low which is associated with a large scale trough, is stationary or may even retrograde.
The differences and similarities between a WV Vortex and an Upper Level Low are listed in the tables below.
Differences:
| WV-vortex (Eye/Eddy) | Upper Level Low | |
| Process | Small upper level cyclonic circulation, often embedded in a large scale upper level trough | Cut-off process from a large scale Rossby Wave |
| Cloudiness | Can only be seen in WV imagery. Sometimes small convective cloud cells develop which can also be seen in IR and VIS imagery | Vigorous convective activity develops especially in the mature stage which can be clearly seen in all channels |
| Scale | Small scale/ Mesoscale system | Synoptical scale system |
| Velocity | Moving system, associated with a mobile trough | Associated with a quasi-stationary trough |
Similarities:
| Timescale | Persistent, can last for several days | WV imagery | Both appear as a cyclonic circulation of dry and moist air streams. |